Sub-contracted GPs now have access to the NHS Pension Scheme

Following a period of consultation, the Department of Health has published regulations allowing GP practices to pension earnings from sub-contracted clinical services, where the holder of the main contract is also an NHS employer. This came into effect on 1 April 2016.

Previously, the regulations governing the NHS pension scheme did not allow any payments made through an intermediary or sub-contractor to be pensionable. Whilst this provision was designed to limit the inappropriate extension of liabilities under the scheme, it no longer fits with the various new models of care envisaged by the Five Year Forward View. The increasing number of GP federations being a lead contractor and sub-contracting to their GP Practice members was particularly troublesome. Under the amended regulations, GP practices who hold a GMS, PMS or APMS contract will be able to attain Employing Authority (EA) status and allow their GP members to pension their income earned under that sub-contract, assuming that the holder of the main contract is also an EA.

In order to ensure that only NHS work is pensionable, and that scheme liabilities are adequately controlled, GP federations will be required to use the NHS standard sub-contract, which has been jointly produced by NHS England and the Department of Health.

Alternatives to sub-contracting

GP federations can of course set themselves up to become an EA through  the “classic” APMS route i.e. holding an APMS contract and being eligible to enter into a GMS or PMS contract, and therefore providing services directly. Another option would be for the CCG to contract directly with each member surgery, although this is administratively difficult and is inconsistent with the movement towards GPs working at scale and the lead provider model. Sub-contracting is becoming an increasingly more popular method of delivering the new models of care and the consultation document and the proposed regulations recognise this.

Retrospective application

The Department of Health has recognised that, on many occasions, the provision of services under a sub-contract may have commenced before the contract is formally entered into. Therefore, it is proposed that federations applying for Independent Provider (IP) status can identify a retrospective “nominated date” which would be the approval date for IP status in certain circumstances. 

In order to be granted retrospective IP status, the GP federation must have paid employer and employee contributions for the relevant period, and must satisfy certain other criteria, including being party to a qualifying contract. In order to be a “party” to a contract, the contract must be signed and dated by all parties, and therefore it is questionable whether, in practice, many providers will be granted retrospective status, given that it is the failure to conclude contractual formalities prior to commencing the services that renders them unable to obtain IP status. In any event this provision will apply only in very specific circumstances and it should not be supposed that retrospective IP status will be possible to attain in respect of existing contracts/services.

Last updated : 13 Apr 2016

 

Tips of the month March 2021 (24 Mar 2021)

We provide monthly tips based on common queries which come through to us from London GPs and practice teams. These are shared via social media and collated for...
Read more »

2021 is an election year, stand for your LMC (24 Mar 2021)

This year all the seats on our 27 LMCs are up for election, with nominations opening on 26 April and closing on 28 May. During the week of 26 April...
Read more »

GP Forward View five years on (24 Mar 2021)

The GP Forward View (GPFV) launched on 21 April 2016, with several commitments and aims for improving general practice and the care provided to patients. On 28 April, Dr Lisa...
Read more »

Stress Awareness Month 2021 (24 Mar 2021)

April is Stress Awareness Month and a timely point to reflect on the challenges faced by general practice over the course of the last year. The Coronavirus pandemic has been a very stressful...
Read more »

Covid-19 vaccination programme guidance round-up, March 2021 (23 Mar 2021)

Since our last newsletter there have been a number of new or updated pieces of guidance that are applicable to the GP run parts of the Covid-19 vaccination programme. The...
Read more »

Workforce survey results - winter 2020 (23 Mar 2021)

We had responses from 384 individuals, working in 316 different practices out of the 1,100 member practices surveyed between 24 November to 16 December 2020. This represents a response rate...
Read more »

Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy outreach (23 Mar 2021)

Londonwide LMCs and London general practice are supporting Public Health England (PHE) London’s “speaker bureau” initiative, connecting speakers with good general clinical and Covid-19 vaccine knowledge with community events. This...
Read more »

Response to CQC strategy consultation (23 Mar 2021)

Londonwide LMCs responded to the CQC’s strategy consultation before the closing deadline of 4 March 2021. Key points from the response are summarised below, group around the strategy’s four...
Read more »

Why sessional GPs should stand for their LMC (23 Mar 2021)

Ahead of this summer’s elections, Dr Veno Suri explains how he got involved with his area’s LMC and the value he has had from LMC membership. Veno joined Hillingdon LMC...
Read more »
Next Page »
« Previous Page