Sub-contracted GPs now have access to the NHS Pension Scheme

Following a period of consultation, the Department of Health has published regulations allowing GP practices to pension earnings from sub-contracted clinical services, where the holder of the main contract is also an NHS employer. This came into effect on 1 April 2016.

Previously, the regulations governing the NHS pension scheme did not allow any payments made through an intermediary or sub-contractor to be pensionable. Whilst this provision was designed to limit the inappropriate extension of liabilities under the scheme, it no longer fits with the various new models of care envisaged by the Five Year Forward View. The increasing number of GP federations being a lead contractor and sub-contracting to their GP Practice members was particularly troublesome. Under the amended regulations, GP practices who hold a GMS, PMS or APMS contract will be able to attain Employing Authority (EA) status and allow their GP members to pension their income earned under that sub-contract, assuming that the holder of the main contract is also an EA.

In order to ensure that only NHS work is pensionable, and that scheme liabilities are adequately controlled, GP federations will be required to use the NHS standard sub-contract, which has been jointly produced by NHS England and the Department of Health.

Alternatives to sub-contracting

GP federations can of course set themselves up to become an EA through  the “classic” APMS route i.e. holding an APMS contract and being eligible to enter into a GMS or PMS contract, and therefore providing services directly. Another option would be for the CCG to contract directly with each member surgery, although this is administratively difficult and is inconsistent with the movement towards GPs working at scale and the lead provider model. Sub-contracting is becoming an increasingly more popular method of delivering the new models of care and the consultation document and the proposed regulations recognise this.

Retrospective application

The Department of Health has recognised that, on many occasions, the provision of services under a sub-contract may have commenced before the contract is formally entered into. Therefore, it is proposed that federations applying for Independent Provider (IP) status can identify a retrospective “nominated date” which would be the approval date for IP status in certain circumstances. 

In order to be granted retrospective IP status, the GP federation must have paid employer and employee contributions for the relevant period, and must satisfy certain other criteria, including being party to a qualifying contract. In order to be a “party” to a contract, the contract must be signed and dated by all parties, and therefore it is questionable whether, in practice, many providers will be granted retrospective status, given that it is the failure to conclude contractual formalities prior to commencing the services that renders them unable to obtain IP status. In any event this provision will apply only in very specific circumstances and it should not be supposed that retrospective IP status will be possible to attain in respect of existing contracts/services.

Last updated : 13 Apr 2016

 

Responding to online comments about your practice (13 Apr 2018)

This is a reminder for practices about what they can do if they receive notification of negative comments posted on the NHS Choices website.  We understand practices are notified...
Read more »

Recommended codes for vaccinations (12 Apr 2018)

Childhood vaccination coding can be unexpectedly complex there are just 26 pre-school and school age vaccinations, but practices can record these vaccinations using over 1,000 different codes.  Data export providers,...
Read more »

LEAD events May and June 2018 (12 Apr 2018)

Hold the date: our annual Practice Manager Conference will take place on Thursday 22 November 2018 at Woburn House Conference Centre. The following events are now available for online booking....
Read more »

Stand. Vote. Engage. The 2018 LMC elections (12 Apr 2018)

Nomination papers for this year’s LMC elections were sent out in the week beginning 30 April 2018. This year every LMC seat is up for election.  We want any GP...
Read more »

Concerns about coroners issues (21 Mar 2018)

In response to concerns raised regarding GP relationships with the coroners’ office, we recently requested examples of problems experienced by GPs and practice staff. Examples provided so far include:  ...
Read more »

GMC requests for evidence of English language competence (20 Mar 2018)

The House of Commons Library has release updated guidance on what documentation the GMC will accept as evidence that GPs, nurses and pharmacists have sufficient English language skills. These controls...
Read more »

LMC elections – join us in May to learn about what is involved in being an LMC member (20 Mar 2018)

This year every LMC seat is up for election and next month you will have a chance to stand for election to your LMC. Any GP working in one of...
Read more »

NHS Digital questioned on Home Office data sharing (20 Mar 2018)

On Thursday 15 March the Health and Social Care Select Committee took evidence from Sarah Wilkinson, Chief Executive Officer, NHS Digital; and Noel Gordon, Chair, NHS Digital on data sharing. ...
Read more »

UK LMC Conference 2018 round-up (20 Mar 2018)

This year's LMC Conference saw debate on a range of issues of concern to London GPs: from Bawa-Garbar and the use of written reflections, to mass resignations, workload management, and...
Read more »
Next Page »
« Previous Page