Sub-contracted GPs now have access to the NHS Pension Scheme

Following a period of consultation, the Department of Health has published regulations allowing GP practices to pension earnings from sub-contracted clinical services, where the holder of the main contract is also an NHS employer. This came into effect on 1 April 2016.

Previously, the regulations governing the NHS pension scheme did not allow any payments made through an intermediary or sub-contractor to be pensionable. Whilst this provision was designed to limit the inappropriate extension of liabilities under the scheme, it no longer fits with the various new models of care envisaged by the Five Year Forward View. The increasing number of GP federations being a lead contractor and sub-contracting to their GP Practice members was particularly troublesome. Under the amended regulations, GP practices who hold a GMS, PMS or APMS contract will be able to attain Employing Authority (EA) status and allow their GP members to pension their income earned under that sub-contract, assuming that the holder of the main contract is also an EA.

In order to ensure that only NHS work is pensionable, and that scheme liabilities are adequately controlled, GP federations will be required to use the NHS standard sub-contract, which has been jointly produced by NHS England and the Department of Health.

Alternatives to sub-contracting

GP federations can of course set themselves up to become an EA through  the “classic” APMS route i.e. holding an APMS contract and being eligible to enter into a GMS or PMS contract, and therefore providing services directly. Another option would be for the CCG to contract directly with each member surgery, although this is administratively difficult and is inconsistent with the movement towards GPs working at scale and the lead provider model. Sub-contracting is becoming an increasingly more popular method of delivering the new models of care and the consultation document and the proposed regulations recognise this.

Retrospective application

The Department of Health has recognised that, on many occasions, the provision of services under a sub-contract may have commenced before the contract is formally entered into. Therefore, it is proposed that federations applying for Independent Provider (IP) status can identify a retrospective “nominated date” which would be the approval date for IP status in certain circumstances. 

In order to be granted retrospective IP status, the GP federation must have paid employer and employee contributions for the relevant period, and must satisfy certain other criteria, including being party to a qualifying contract. In order to be a “party” to a contract, the contract must be signed and dated by all parties, and therefore it is questionable whether, in practice, many providers will be granted retrospective status, given that it is the failure to conclude contractual formalities prior to commencing the services that renders them unable to obtain IP status. In any event this provision will apply only in very specific circumstances and it should not be supposed that retrospective IP status will be possible to attain in respect of existing contracts/services.

Last updated : 13 Apr 2016

 

Mword 31 - We have your backs (01 Dec 2016)

1 December...
Read more »

Meeting with David Burrowes MP (24 Nov 2016)

On 4 November Dr Michelle Drage met David Burrowes, the Conservative MP for Enfield Southgate, at the Gillan House Surgery in his constituency. They were joined by Dr Vicky Weeks,...
Read more »

Health Select Committee winter pressure report endorses community general practice model (24 Nov 2016)

On 3 November the Health Select Committee released its report Winter pressure in accident and emergency departments. The main findings reflect our concerns that lack of support for community...
Read more »

PCSE Performers List problems and alternative arrangements (24 Nov 2016)

All GP trainees, newly qualified GPs and GPs applying to join the Medical Performers’ List should be aware of the following issues: GPs are not lawfully allowed to perform any...
Read more »

New GPC Co-Commissioning Guidance (24 Nov 2016)

The BMA General Practitioners Committee have issued a guidance update for GP practices and LMCs in England about options for Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) to take greater commissioning control (“co-commissioning”),...
Read more »

2016 Autumn Statement and Dr Michelle Drage's response (24 Nov 2016)

Yesterday (Wednesday) Chancellor, Rt Hon Philip Hammond MP, delivered his first, and last, Autumn Statement. From 2017 there will be a Spring statement responding the Spring OBR report and an...
Read more »

Our November 2016 workforce survey is now live (24 Nov 2016)

Thank you in advance for making space in your hectic day to complete our short survey on practice workforce issues which will help us to gather insight to share with...
Read more »

Patient participation workshops starting in the New Year (24 Nov 2016)

Our Patient Engagement project has been working with practices and patient participation group (PPG) members to identify the benefits and challenges involved in developing active and effective PPGs. As a...
Read more »
Next Page »
« Previous Page