Guest blog – Dealing with online patient comments

Our GP Support team’s Jan Swannell shares how she managed online complaints during her time as a practice manager in North London.

After 15 years as a practice manager I joined Londonwide LMCs’ GP Support team last August as an assistant manager.  In my time as practice manager I have, like most of you, seen many changes in general practice, not the least the advent and development of the dreaded CQC inspection.

Like it or loath it (or should that be loath it or loath it even more?) it’s here to stay, so we need to ensure that our day-to-day working practices embrace the principles of CQC’s regulations, which to be honest in many cases they do.  But when focusing on the bigger picture it’s easy to forget, or not get around to reviewing the smaller things they will also look at. One of these is acknowledging and responding to online comments made on NHS Choices (or via your own website), which of course, falls into the area of ‘Are services responsive to people’s needs?’.

You will probably recognise the scenario, it’s a day when things just haven’t gone to plan…

A doctor has called in sick, you can’t get locum cover so clinics must be cancelled; then you’re told that two receptionists also have the flu so won’t be in, which makes afternoon cover a nightmare and the rest of the week is looking dire. On top of this the caffeine from your first coffee hasn’t kicked in yet when ‘ping’ you get an alert to a comment just posted on NHS Choices.  Your heart sinks (after all you rarely get ‘pings’ when things are going well) and sure enough when you open it there’s a comment from an unhappy and anonymous patient.

Complaints hurt, especially when you know the whole team is going the extra mile, and on a day like this my first instinct would be to close it and put it in the ‘too difficult to deal with now’ pile; but is that really the best course of action? CQC inspectors want to see how we respond to patients, and that increasingly includes them doing a quick flick through the comments on NHS Choices, noting a practice’s responses to them, and looking for any actions taken.

So, always try to respond quickly to online comments. If it’s nice, you can just thank the sender for their kind words and ensure staff/doctors also get to see it. If its negative, then use the same time frame and processes that you would for any other written complaint, but don’t ignore it or push it to one side. No matter what you’d like to say, always ensure that your reply is professional and factual rather than defensive or aggressive.

Even if the complainant is anonymous, there’s still no reason why you can’t ask them to contact you direct so their views can be discussed.  They may not respond, but at least you’ve tried.  This action is recognised as a powerful reputational management tactic and can be a useful device against an unfair comment.  It shows that you are listening and prepared to be objective.

Sometimes you’ll receive a comment that you think is defamatory; here you have two choices:

If a name is included, then you can respond directly to the person, requesting that they amend or remove their comment.  If they won’t, then follow the process for anonymous comments, below.

If its anonymous then immediately contact the website administrator asking for it to be removed but remember that you’re going to have to include reasons why you feel the comment is defamatory.  Once you’ve raised the complaint, then the site administrator should remove the comment quite quickly if it doesn’t have any contact details, but this will take longer if the administrator is able to contact the writer.

So, time for another coffee?  Well before you go and put the kettle on don’t forget to add the complaint details to your audit information.  A regular review of this information will help you see if there are any patterns and/or areas that you could make changes/improvements to, e.g. more complaints about Tuesday clinics when there are less doctors working could result in a change of working patterns or appointment types.

The audit can also help you devise template replies to reoccurring complaint areas, like lack of appointments, waiting times etc., which can then be used as responses by other staff members, so freeing up some of your time.

Finally, you may find some of the following guidance from NHS Choices helpful:

Last updated : 23 Feb 2017

 

Londonwide Enterprise update (17 Aug 2016)

Practice managers conference and events Speakers have been confirmed for the Practice Manager Conference to be held at Woburn House on Thursday 22 September 2016. ‘Leadership through Change: making the...
Read more »

Patient engagement survey (17 Aug 2016)

We are asking for practices to share their experience of successfully developing their patient engagement work, including top tips, by completing our patient engagement surveys. These will help shape the...
Read more »

London Improvement Grant Fund 2017-18 (17 Aug 2016)

The London Improvement Grant Fund application process is now open. Practices need to submit their applications by 17:00 on Friday 30 September 2016 by emailing them to: England.LondonIGfund@nhs.net.  Practices should...
Read more »

NHS England Update on Estates and Technology Transformation Fund (ETTF) (17 Aug 2016)

Unfortunately, information regarding submission dates for reimbursement claims  for NHS England’s Estates and Technology Transformation Fund (ETTF) has caused some confusion. Please note that the submission date change is not related...
Read more »

New GPSoE Resources - Posters (16 Aug 2016)

We have produced two posters to help practices explain to patients and staff why we are in a state of emergency. One is for your waiting room and outlines the...
Read more »

Capita list cleanse plan (16 Aug 2016)

At the end of July it was reported that part of the new Primary Care Support Services contract between NHS England and Capita would include a list cleanse programme, designed...
Read more »

New requirements for hospitals re work with general practice (16 Aug 2016)

Londonwide LMCs’ CEO Dr Michelle Drage has written to Trust and Foundation Trust CEOs across London asking how they plan to implement the new requirements outlined in the 2016/17 NHS...
Read more »

General Practice Resilience Programme funding (16 Aug 2016)

£2.65m of resilience funding is available to London practices this financial year, as the Capital’s share of a £16m national pot, promised as part of the GP Forward View. This...
Read more »

TPP QRISK2 error – responsibility for practices (16 Aug 2016)

NHS England is concerned that only around half of practices affected by the TPP QRISK2 error have accessed the lists of affected patients provided to them.  Dr Andrew Green,...
Read more »

Feedback on Capita Primary Care Support England services (16 Aug 2016)

Following concerns expressed about the current Capita/Primary Care Support England (PCSE) records and supplies services, the BMA recently sought feedback on practices’ experience of Capita’s service. Dan Hodgson in the...
Read more »
Next Page »
« Previous Page